A tale worth telling of four women scientists whose names you should know but don’t

Book Review

Sisters in Science: How Four Women Physicists Escaped Nazi Germany and Made Scientific History

By Olivia Campbell
Park Row Books: 368 pages, $32.99
If you purchase books on our web site, The Times could earn a fee from Bookshop.org, whose charges assist unbiased bookstores.

You might need heard of Lise Meitner. A native of Austria, she was the primary girl to turn into a full professor of physics in Germany. She additionally helped uncover nuclear fission. Yet the 1944 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for that accomplishment went solely to her longtime collaborator, Otto Hahn.

Meitner battled misogyny and sexism at each stage of her illustrious profession. But rising antisemitism and the 1933 Nazi takeover of Germany had been a fair higher-order drawback. Although she was a convert to Lutheranism, her Jewish heritage endangered her. With the assistance of associates, she was capable of flee in 1938 to impartial Sweden, the place she was protected but scientifically remoted. “I can never discuss my experiments with anyone who understands them,” she wrote to fellow physicist Hedwig Kohn.

In “Sisters in Science,” Olivia Campbell tells the intertwined tales of Meitner and three different notable, but lesser recognized, women physicists from Germany: Kohn, Hertha Sponer and Hildegard Stücklen. Only Kohn was Jewish, but the Third Reich’s hostility to women teachers value the opposite two jobs as effectively.

Cover photo of "Sisters in Science"

Cover picture of “Sisters in Science”

(Park Row Books)

All three ultimately made it to the United States, the place they pursued their careers and continued to assist each other (and Meitner too). Kohn, the final to flee, didn’t make it out of Europe till 1940. She endured two months of arduous journey by way of the Soviet Union and Japan and throughout the Pacific Ocean, barely surviving the ordeal.

Theirs is an inspiring tale, and effectively worth telling — all of the extra so as a result of, as Campbell notes in her dedication, so many different women teachers had been murdered by the Nazis. “Their absence haunts this book; the rippling impact of their loss affects us all,” she writes.

But its intrinsic curiosity however, “Sisters in Science” is a generally irritating learn. Part of the issue is its formidable scope. Group biography is a tough style. Campbell has to meld four narrative arcs: parallel at instances, overlapping at others, but additionally divergent. A extra elegant stylist, or a real adept of narrative nonfiction, might need managed to combine these tales extra seamlessly. It doesn’t assist that Campbell refers to her protagonists by their first names — and three of the four start with the letter “H.”

Explaining the physics to a lay viewers is one other problem, maybe an insuperable one. Campbell makes an attempt it solely nominally. The thought of fission, the splitting of atomic nuclei and ensuing manufacturing of huge quantities of power, is kind of intelligible. But the accomplishments of the opposite three physicists, who labored in spectroscopy, optics and astrophysics, are tougher to know.

The e book additionally would have benefited from higher copy modifying and fact-checking. Whatever her bona fides as a science journalist, Campbell is just not at residence in Holocaust historical past. One instance: Campbell locates Dachau, the Nazis’ first focus camp, in Oranienburg, a suburb of Berlin. Dachau opened in 1933 within the city of Dachau, close to Munich. Oranienburg was truly the location of one other eponymous camp after which, in 1936, Sachsenhausen.

There are different errors and infelicities. Campbell frequently refers to Kristallnacht, the November 1938 Nazi pogrom, as “the Kristallnacht.” A extra severe lapse is her anachronistic suggestion that, in 1938, Meitner feared being deported to a “death camp.” Camps corresponding to Dachau and Sachsenhausen had been brutal, usually murderous locations, but within the Thirties, they principally housed Nazi political opponents (some of them Jewish). Jews weren’t but being deported from Germany, and the six loss of life camps devoted to their extermination — locations corresponding to Sobibor, Treblinka and Auschwitz-Birkenau, all in Poland — didn’t turn into operational till the early Forties.

It can also be considerably crude, and arguably inaccurate, to say that Kristallnacht “exposed the Nazis’ true agenda for the Jewish people: they wanted them all dead.” Despite the rising virulence of anti-Jewish persecution, that objective was not but clear, and never but official coverage. In truth, although some had been killed, most of the 30,000 or so Jewish males rounded up and brought to focus camps throughout Kristallnacht had been launched on the situation that they to migrate.

Presumably Campbell is on firmer floor elsewhere — in noting, as an example, the difficulties that women scientists confronted in Germany, together with fights for pay, lab house and recognition; and in emphasizing the ways in which they, and some sympathetic male colleagues, helped each other endure, flourish and ultimately escape.

When she first turned Hahn’s assistant in Berlin, for instance, Meitner was exiled from the principle lab and caught in a basement workshop with no close by restroom. She finally rose to go the physics division at Berlin’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry, a put up she retained even after her Nazi-era dismissal from the University of Berlin.

Some male scientists had been useless set towards women. Others, corresponding to Max Planck, welcomed collaboration from solely probably the most distinctive of their feminine friends. One heroic supporter of women in science was the Nobel laureate James Franck. A German Jew, he resigned his put up on the University of Göttingen earlier than he might be fired, immigrated to the United States through Denmark, and was later instrumental in aiding colleagues, together with women, who remained behind.

Franck and Sponer, his onetime assistant, had been particularly shut — each associates and scientific collaborators. After a stint on the University of Oslo, Sponer accepted a place at North Carolina’s Duke University in 1936, and commenced working with Edward Teller, the eventual creator of the hydrogen bomb, “on the vibrational excitation of polyatomic molecules by electron collisions.”

Only after Franck’s spouse died in 1942 did his long-germinating romance with Sponer come to fruition. He remained on the University of Chicago, and he or she at Duke. But in 1946, they married, and in Campbell’s sympathetic telling, skilled true happiness amid the sorrows round them.

Julia M. Klein is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *