Prince Harry and Meghan Markle returning to the Royal Family as working members could be “completely impractical” and trigger a “circus” for the monarchy, it has been claimed.
The Duke of Sussex is ready to return to British soil tomorrow to attend the WellChild Awards in London, a trigger near the estranged royal’s coronary heart.
Following a string of solo engagements in New York with out his spouse, questions have been raised as as to whether it’s the proper time for the Sussexes to make amends with the Royal Family and return to the working Firm.
Hitting out on the couple, royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams claimed that Harry and Meghan “can’t be trusted” and would trigger a “circus” at each royal engagement they attend, drawing the eye away from the monarchy.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s royal return is in query following a string of solo engagements for the Duke
PA
Speaking to GB News, Fitzwilliams argued: “They don’t want to come back. You’re dealing with an institution that is so serious, if they actually came back you’d have a circus.
“Every single royal occasion that concerned the Sussexes, you’d have the concentrate on them and it will, in actuality, be fully impractical.”
Noting the continued royal rift between the Sussexes and the monarchy, Fitzwilliams added that except Harry and Meghan “apologise” for the way they have behaved, there would be “completely no means” of a return to working life.
Fitzwilliams said: “If you think about up to now 4 years they’ve performed a guerrilla struggle in opposition to the Royal Family, and they’ve achieved monumental injury to it. When did the Sussexes final say one thing that was beneficial in regards to the Royal Family?
The Duke of Sussex will return to the UK on Sunday to attend the WellChild Awards
PA
“They’d want an apology for the way that Harry believed Meghan was badly treated when they were senior working royals. So there’s no way they are going to come back, they don’t want to. They’re happy in California, supposedly, and most certainly on the issue of trust, who would trust them?”
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
In defence of Harry and Meghan, former royal gardener Jack Stooks argued that the Sussexes have achieved “nothing wrong” of their criticism of the Royal Family, and all they’ve achieved is “be themselves”.
Stooks argued: “Harry chose to marry Meghan. Everybody has an opinion and everybody’s entitled to that opinion, like them or loathe them. But they haven’t been given a ban on not coming back to England.
“So in the event that they need to come again to England, allow them to come again to England. If they do not need to come again to England once more, they needn’t. It is their lives. If Harry is is coming again and needs to see his household, why should not he be allowed to try this?”
Interjecting Stooks, Fitzwilliams claims that the royal rift is “so dangerous” between Harry and his brother William that there is “no dialog” occurring for the time being.
Richard Fitzwilliams says a royal return for the Sussexes would be a ‘circus’ for the monarchy
GB News
Fitzwilliams advised GB News: “I’m afraid the rift is so dangerous that there is a lot of hypothesis – we do not know whether or not they speak privately to one another, how would we? But there most actually is just not a dialog for the time being publicly between William and Harry.
“This was obvious at Lord Fellowes’s memorial service. They were both at the back of the church and reportedly didn’t say a word to each other. And if that was the case, that they wanted to come back, what was arranged at the Sandringham Agreement would have to be looked at again.”
Fitzwilliams continued: “And that would mean that Sussexes would have their cake and eat it, so to speak, because they could do the commercial projects along with royal activities. It’s a question of whether or not they would want to do royal duties. They wanted half in, half out – you can’t renegotiate that, because that isn’t being royal.
“The Royal Family is a critical establishment, it is pivotal to our unwritten structure. It’s a image of nationwide unity. This could be ridiculous.”
